COLVIC WATSON NEWS

   I have absolutely no wish to be the sole contributor to the website.  This page is meant for news of members and their boats, cruises etc.  It will only survive if others provide material.

 

Because the Bulletin Board is again being heavily spammed, I have closed it for a while, until I can sort out a defence.  This might mean some sort of registration, or sign in code.

 

Meanwhile, the current and interesting material from the Board, has been transcribed below.

 


I'm considering buying a colvic watson 34.
I cannot find any information about her fuel consumption or what speed she will do under sail.
Any information would be much appreciated
Thank you
Keith Goggin.

 

Re: C W 34 Hi Keith Scot Free is a 34.5 CW with a Thornycroft 6 cylinder. Coming down the French canals we ran at 750 rpm, got 3.5 knots and used an astonishing 1 litre per hour. In the med we run at 1000 rpm and use 3.5 to 4 litres per hour and in a calm sea make 5knts. Add a sea and headwind and speed drops or revs increase and fuel consumption gets silly for us. We are ketch rigged and cant sail in less than F2. If speed drops below 2knts we lose steerage. Give us F4-5 on the beam and she does an easy 5. Last season we ran down wind in a 5 with a big following sea and held a steady 5.5knts with only the genoa. The mizzen may have added another knot but did not bother. Our record under full sail is 8knts in a F7 with no sea running cos the wind came from nowhere. Its great to have 100hp if things turn nasty and she is a great live aboard. All the best, Jack - Jack McFadzean

 

Has anyone got any ideas on replacing an old Thorneycroft 2.5 diesel in a 28.6ft Watson. Is there any other which could replace it without too much changing of skin fittings, and does the doghouse roof have to be cut open to permit the lifting and replacement of The engine.
Thanks in anticipation.

 

Both Colin Jones and I replaced the engines in our 28ft6" CWs with the 50hp Beta BV2203 model (my previous engine certainly was a Thorny, can't remember about Colin's). Colin has regularly written about how delighted he is with his - and he uses his boat very extensively so has the engine hours to make a good judgement. So far I fully agree but, in all fairness, my boat has been in the water so little since fitting the new engine (owing to other refurbishment work) that it would be rather unfair to judge it yet. I also replaced the gearbox - it was in much worse condition than the engine - and chose the PMR option at extra cost; again, so far, I am very happy with that choice.

In my case I did not have to alter any skin fittings beyond replacement of like-for-like on age grounds - the existing positions and sizes were fine for the new installation. The engineer had to reposition the engine mounts but only by moving them along the same bearers. All the piping was replaced but that seemed only sensible on a 23 year old installation whilst we had the luxury of totally clear access. Obviously it all depends on your having a good installation for the old engine in the first place. I found that the new panel for the Beta (I went for the largest one with all the gauges) was slightly larger than the old one so it was a case of enlarging the hole rather than having to cover up gaps. However, the next season I then went and remodelled the entire area in front of the wheel so I started afresh anyway!

As to getting the engine out, that depends on the exact layout of your boat. In Colin's case I gather he was able to bring the strop from a crane in through the roof hatch, lift the engine into the wheelhouse, support it temporarily to allow removal of the strop, and manually manoeuvre it through the door into the cockpit. In my case, although I had the roof hatch and the same principle ought to have worked, the yard staff measured it very carefully and determined that it wouldn't fit through the doorway without some major dismantling in situ so they had to cut an access through the roof (very carefully) and replace it afterwards. I guess it depends on the doorway - this is one part of the wheelhouse which is non-standard even it you have the Colvic moulded roof, since the wheelhouse mouldings do not include the aft bulkhead, and builders do their own thing. Of course, if you don't have a roof hatch in the first place, you are likely to have to make a hole to allow crane strop access, unless you can rig up some temporary frame within the wheelhouse to allow you to hang a tackle or winch.

 

Posted by paul erne on February 04, 2006 at 00:53:51:

Has anybody out there sailed their CW across the Atlantic Ocean ? My sixteen year old son and I (possibly with another father and son ) intend taking part in the ARC - Atlantic Rally for Cruisers, next year (November 2007) and would welcome any advice on undertaking an ocean passage in a CW. Our boat, 'Rhubarb 2', is a CW 29, sloop rig, aft cockpit, ( very much like Colin Jones' except without anything like as much electronic equipment ) and there's an important consideration - how much fancy equipment should we invest in ? Radar is probably a good idea. Spare GPS ? 2 spare GPSs ? Water maker ?
Autopilot ? Self steering ? Two of us will obviously need half the stores but would a crew of 4 be easier and more fun ? And what is a CW like on a long passage ? And should we turn around in the Carribean and come back or carry on westwards ? Has anyone completed a circumnavigation in a CW yet ?

Yes, we are possibly slightly mad but life is for living and although we will be one of the smallest boats in the fleet the Atlantic has been crossed by plenty of smaller, much less solidly built vessels.

And would anyone care to join us with their CW ?

Any advice apart from don't do it will be very gratefully received.

 

HI Paul,
In 1997 my wife and I set off dor what turned out to be a 2 1/2 year trip from Hull to the Carribean via the Canaries, returning to the UK from St. Johns Newfoundland . We did this in our Colvis Watson 34. I am sure we have lots of useful information that would help you and your son on your way. Please do not hesitate to email us to discuss this in more detail. Regards, Charles

 

 

 

 

 

NEWS OF OTHER COLVIC WATSONS

From Doug Jones, with the Site Manager's sincere thanks.

SEVERN MAGPIE

Severn Magpie was built in 1978.  Mr Luxton who is a shipwright based in Gloucestershire purchased the hull, and he fitted it out to a very high standard for himself.

The hull is C.W. 28.5 ft but all the rest of the boat is not to C.W. design, the decks and works above the deck level are carried out in 1 inch marine ply which has been treated externally with fibre glass resign.

The external varnished wood work i.e gunwales, handrails etc are all teak.

Just a note on teak, I have tried many types of varnish, all of which last from 6 months to a year before splitting and allowing water to penetrate the wood. I now use a French varnish called Le Tonkinois, obtainable from Traditional Boats in Suffolk, which I have found to be very good, the varnish work done 2 years ago is still in near perfect condition 

The inside of the boat is all varnish applied to marine grade mahogany faced ply.  The deck beams, which are mahogany still have the original varnish which is still as good as new, as is most of the internal wood work.

The timber gunwales, beam shelves, deck head beams and general timber work is of hard woods, which is generally very much over sized, in fact she is built like a brick s...  house.

The main mast was installed by myself in 2001, until then she only had the mizzen mast.

 Before the main mast was fitted I was able to contact Mr Luxton to ask if the extra beams and supports to the hull had been fitted when he fitted her out, I was informed by him that she had more than enough support to take a 30ft mast.

I therefore fitted a mahogany plate to the cabin top and bolted this and the tabernacle down through 2no 3x2 inch deck head beams.

While fitting the chain plates I had to drill through the external 3x2 inch teak gunwale, hull, and 3x3 inch internal beam shelf, and was amazed to find that the hull was about 1 inch thick, don’t make ‘em like that to-day!

By adding the main mast and roller reefing jib she sails very well, and is balanced as well as most yachts.  On a tack or reach you can leave the wheel for minutes and she stays in the slot,which is very handy as I sail single handed 98% of the time.

With regard to sailing single handed she is a very sea kindly boat and handles very easily under motor or sail, all the sail controls are in the aft cockpit,so no need to go out on deck.

Magpie is a very steady boat due to the large bilge keels fitted. I have sailed in a C.W.28.5ft which had no bilge keels and there is a big difference between the two, infact the owner of the aforementioned boat, who has also sailed in Magpie intends to have b/keels fitted when he has her taken out this winter.(if interested I will send some photos of the keels when Magpie comes out this year)

Being single handed I manage to moor up to the marina pontoon quite easily by having a cleat amidships on the gunwale,and a rope fixed to the pontoon. I can come along side,nip off and secure the rope to the cleat, pulling the boat tight into the jetty,the rope is placed so that when  tight the boat is in the exact position to put the mooring ropes on. On that single rope she will sit there as long as you like.

The single handed sailing is a result of the fact that ‘her indoors’ hates any type of boating, the last royal visit we had was about 3 years ago for an afternoon.

The engine was replaced  about 4 years ago, as the old B.M.C 2.2, like some one else’s we know, gave up the ghost, it was replaced with a Nissan marine engine LD 20 being a 55hp unit. At first we had a lot of trouble with it.  The engineer who installed it could not get the fuel pump to work correctly, this was changed by the supplier, but the replacement also would not work.  The supplier suggested that the engineer should try to have the problem solved, also the injectors checked.  The unit was sent to a company in Surrey who checked out the pump on a computer and returned a fully working unit to me, also 3 injectors were reset.

Since the first hiccup the engine runs as sweet as a nut, and has never been a problem since.

As for cruises I do not sail very far being single handed, not that I want to go far. I get enjoyment just sailing locally, working on her when I like, having a kip when I want to, and the odd visit to the local pub.N.B. I never take the boat out after a drink!

All in all any one wanting a good safe and sea kindly boat can in my opinion do no better than a well fitted out Colvic Watson.  You look after her and she will look after you.  

 

  

 

 

 

  

Doug.Jones   21/10/2004

 

WHISKY MAC by TOM SCALWAY

 

IN THE TEXT, TOM HAS ASKED A SERIES OF QUESTIONS.  I AM SURE THAT OTHER OWNERS WILL BE ABLE TO HELP HIM.

 

IF YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS, EITHER POST THEM ON THE BULLETIN BOARD, OR LET ME HAVE THEM AS EMAIL AND I WILL ADD THEM TO THE FOOT OF TOM’S ARTICLE.  [CJ]

Looks like I find myself a Colvic Watson 28.5 owner! Went up to Anglesey a few weeks ago to view the boat and bought her very soon afterwards. She is an absolute babe – in the Colvic chug-along way – but in need of the odd spot of work. Wish I had been able to see her getting towed around the M25 to Littlehampton where she is now on the hard – that is probably the fastest the boat will ever go!

I am getting a new rudder fitted in Littlehampton, and have just put a deposit down on a new Lancing Marine 40hp diesel engine. Next I need to refit all the deck fittings as they do not have the backing they need. Already I have started trying to fix her up inside – but this is going to be a long job. I am seriously considering gutting the cabin and starting again. Anyone know where you can get readymade kitchen/galley units? Mine look tired and very untidy. They could also be set back further to the wall to increase floor space – but Ia m not sure if I will have the requisite time, skill or cash. Guess that is the perennial issue with this kind of project.

Other jobs I am yet to consider are getting new fendering D section fitted around the sides of the boat, and then there is the small consideration of a whole new rig. Oh…. And the various rotten bits of wood….

OK – so it’s more than the odd spot of work – but when it is sorted it will be a real beauty. Once the Eberspacher is working and the gas system sorted it will be wonderfully toasty in that tubby interior. Am considering a small charcoal stove but seems a bit excessive given the space constraints. I’m hoping to have her on the water by April. May sounds more likely. Questions for other CW owners I have are:

1)      There are no timber joists to strengthen the hull above the level of ballast. Bulwarks and interior fittings must provide some strength, but does that mean these cant be removed?

2)      How seriously are taking the new gas restrictions? Can a gas bottle vent out onto the cockpit (if installed in wheelhouse locker). Do we really need to have the gas stoves that self extinguish as the surveyor writes?

3)      How much ventilation does a wheelhouse need – mine has none?

4)      What is the best way of dealing with the fact that the traditional CW main saloon has a lack of floor space, and space to slouch back – any good redesigns people would recommend?

5)      Has anyone got a good idea who will insure the vessel cheaply?

6)      My boat has a long keel with a steel shoe. The last owner said she held a beautiful line in the water. Are bilge plates really preferable?

Anyone got any pictures of possible interior designs and the way they have their engine compartment organised? Any other CW advice?  Meanwhile I will place on the site some images of the boat now – so you can have the whole "before and after" effect. Meanwhile, I have the odd spot of work to do....

 

   

 

   

 

Tom, owner of Whisky Mac, Brighton. Thomas@scalway.fsnet.co.uk

 

Page 4